To play with the use of the “going after” you should at first seriously decide some points. For example, the object of the “going after” (what event and how to go after it), the subject of the “going after” (the team which will be gone after) and the moment of the beginning of the “going after”. Besides you have to determine your bank for the “going after” and your winning (it means what you want to get).
So, the object of the “going after”. In my opinion the “going after” some loss/winning of the team isn’t the best variant. At first, from the point of view of the usual logics, to bet on the team because it has lost five times is funny.
The second point is that the coefficient during the stakes on the winning/loss is changing very much. And to see on the fifth iteration the coefficient 1.25 is rather unpleasant. The better way to do is the “going after” the totals, but it makes a lot of questions too.
Now about the subject of the “going after”.
For example, starting to go after the team on the total under only because it has already played six matches can’t be done anyway. The choice of the team for the “going after” should be very careful. You should analyze the statistics of all the previous series of the team and in general the specifics of the team’s game (they play in the defense, open etc).
A very important point is the moment of the “going after’s” start. For example if to go after on under, that means you should start after two already played matches on over. But such a simple variant can cause in the future the betting results, which would be the iterations.
That’s why you have to analyze the calendar of the team – with whom does it play in the nearest matches and how can it influence the object of the “going after”.
And now about the bank and the winning.
To start the winning having got money for 3-4 iterations is funny and you should realize it. Coming from the subject and the object of the “going after” you should determine the worst result of the “going after”. I mean how much iteration can exist after the worst games and the worst circumstances. And you have to have the money, obviously, for this number of the iterations. If after the analyzing you see that the “going after” can be longer than 5-6 iterations – you better shouldn’t start it at all.